Context
Ontario has never enacted an official Sterilization Act. Nevertheless, this has not prevented the widespread practice of eugenics. The Ontario government has sanctioned and paid for sterilizations for decades.1(footnote) Unethical sterilizations have been performed in Ontario on those categorized as poor and “mentally unfit.” Over a thousand sterilizations are said to have taken place over many decades. By 1928 First Nations Peoples of Ontario were also being classified by white settlers as mentally unfit based solely on the results from Eurocentric intelligence testing. This classification made them targets of unethical sterilization practices. For example, Peter Sandiford, who called himself a social Darwinist, conducted such tests on First Nations children in Ontario in the 1920s.2(footnote)
It wasn’t until 1986 when the Supreme Court of Canada recognized that sterilization procedures should not be conducted without a patient’s consent, even if requested by their family (in E (Mrs) v. Eve, 2 SCR 388).
The CBC’s The National highlighted the disability rights activism and advocacy, in part by Peter Park, involved in winning the Eve Case.3(footnote) The Eve Case exemplifies the power of activism coming from those labelled with a disability who speak for themselves to reduce the profoundly negative control and influence of eugenic thinking in Ontario. These rights activists have fought for a future that respects the rights of all people under the law, including disabled people and people labelled with disabilities.
Media is also a tool for disability activists to educate people about why it is important to respect peoples’ rights. Individuals who are asked to suffer for the “greater good” also tend to be excluded from that “greater good,” including disabled people and people labelled with disabilities.